To Top
PlayNetwork Independent US gambling guides · state by state You're on PlayFL

DraftKings faces Florida lawsuit over prediction-market products

A new Florida lawsuit from the Seminole Tribe challenges whether DraftKings’ prediction-market and related offerings can legally operate in the state outside the Tribe’s exclusive sports-betting framework.
Tyler Andrews Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

A Florida lawsuit could help decide whether DraftKings’ prediction-market-style products can keep operating in the state as currently offered.

The Seminole Tribe has sued DraftKings in Broward County, alleging the company is offering unlicensed sports betting in Florida and violating the Tribe’s exclusive position under the state’s 2021 gaming compact. The complaint targets DraftKings’ Florida offerings, including its Super App, prediction-market framing, college-sports prop bets and age-verification practices.

What the Seminole Tribe is alleging

According to the complaint, DraftKings’ Florida platform is substantially similar to the sportsbook it operates in states where it holds a sports-betting license. The Tribe argues that calling some products prediction markets does not change how the wagers appear or function for customers.

The lawsuit also points to DraftKings advertising, including references to bonuses and gambling-help resources, as evidence that the challenged products amount to gambling. It further challenges college-sports prop bets and alleges DraftKings does not adequately verify that users are at least 21.

The Tribe, which operates Hard Rock Bet, is seeking an injunction along with restitution, disgorgement of profits, and legal fees and costs. According to the complaint, any recovered money would be prioritized for public-interest measures such as consumer protection and problem-gambling prevention and treatment.

DraftKings’ response and what the case could decide

DraftKings has said its prediction markets operate “in accordance with applicable law.” The company has also described Pick6 as a “peer-to-peer fantasy-sports product based on individual athletes’ performance” rather than sports betting.

The case is shaping up as a test of how Florida law and the 2021 Seminole Compact apply to newer online products that sit between fantasy sports, prediction markets and traditional sports betting. Similar platforms mentioned in coverage of the dispute include Kalshi and Polymarket.

For Florida players, the immediate takeaway is that the challenged products remain under legal scrutiny, not that any rule has changed yet. A ruling for the Tribe could force DraftKings to stop offering the contested products in Florida unless it finds a route to operate that satisfies the court.

What to watch next

The key next step is DraftKings’ formal response in court and whether the Broward County case produces any request for immediate relief, including an injunction. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said he had not read the complaint when asked about the case, but indicated the compact contemplated the Tribe’s ability to offer sports betting in the state.

—

Source: As reported by readwrite.com.

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS

Tyler contributes regularly to PlayFl.com, covering sports, sports law, and gambling for the Sunshine State. He has also covered similar topics for PlayTexas, PlayCA, PlayFlorida, PlayOhio, and PlayMA. Tyler’s current focus is Florida's pathway to sports betting legalization.

VIEW ALL POSTS