Share 
Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour said state regulation of prediction markets would push the industry out of the United States rather than settle a state-versus-federal oversight dispute.
Speaking at DC Fintech Week, Mansour said the real choice is “whether prediction markets exist in the US or whether they go offshore,” according to remarks reported by CoinDesk and cited by CDC Gaming. He also said he feels “pretty good” about Kalshi’s broader position in the ongoing regulatory fight.
Mansour frames the dispute as a federal issue
Mansour argued that prediction markets should remain under federal oversight, not a patchwork of state rules. In his telling, state regulation would not create a workable domestic framework for the sector but would instead drive operators elsewhere.
The source does not identify the specific state or federal actions at issue, nor does it name the regulators or courts directly involved in the current dispute. It also does not provide a timeline for any pending legal or regulatory outcome.
Kalshi defends its sports-event contracts
Mansour also defended Kalshi’s sports-event contracts as federally regulated financial contracts. He rejected arguments that those products do not have enough economic consequences to qualify under federal law, calling that position “ludicrous.”
That distinction matters because the broader debate around prediction markets has increasingly centered on whether event-based contracts tied to sports should be treated under federal financial rules or under state-level gambling frameworks.
For players and industry watchers, the immediate takeaway is that the regulatory fight is still unsettled. What comes next will likely depend on which agencies or legal venues ultimately decide how prediction market products are classified and supervised in the U.S.
—
Source: As reported by cdcgaming.com.
