Share 
The Seminole Tribe of Florida has filed a 72-page complaint against DraftKings in Broward County, accusing the company of conducting illegal sports betting in the state and violating the tribe’s 2021 gaming compact. The filing adds a Florida front to a broader national fight over sports event contracts and prediction markets.
The tribe also named DraftKings CEO Jason Robins in the suit. According to the complaint, DraftKings’ Super App combines predictions, sports wagering and online casino segments in a way that deprives Florida of “substantial revenue and regulatory oversight,” including consumer protections and restrictions on certain bets.
DraftKings said its sports event contracts on its prediction platform operate in accordance with federal regulations set forth in the Commodity Exchange Act, and said it has “deep respect” for the Seminole Tribe.
NFL asks Supreme Court to review Kalshi dispute
In a separate but related development, the NFL filed a 32-page amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to review _Flaherty v. KalshiEx, LLC_. The league said court review is needed to preserve the integrity of professional sports and protect market participants.
The NFL argued that clarity around sports prediction markets is critical for both integrity and consumer protection. In its filing, the league said it is unclear whether the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has the regulatory framework, oversight capacity and enforcement resources needed to ensure prediction markets do not jeopardize game integrity.
The brief pointed to event contracts the league considers especially problematic, including wagers on whether a kicker will miss a field goal, the next penalty in a game, and even non-game transactions such as whether a phrase is mentioned during a broadcast.
Kalshi responded that it has tried to work constructively with the NFL and is actively policing sports-related markets. Polymarket likewise said it shares the NFL’s commitment to preserving game integrity and is constantly enhancing its surveillance tools.
Why the Florida case matters
For Florida readers, the Seminole Tribe’s lawsuit is the most immediate development. The case centers on whether prediction-style products cross into sports betting activity that the tribe says conflicts with its compact rights and the state’s regulatory structure.
That does not resolve the larger national question. But with the NFL, operators and regulators all pressing competing arguments, the outcome of the Supreme Court petition and the Broward County case could help shape how sports event contracts are treated going forward.
For now, the key points to watch are whether the Florida lawsuit advances in Broward County and whether the Supreme Court agrees to hear the Kalshi case. As legal questions around sports prediction products continue to develop, players should keep in mind that regulatory treatment can change quickly and varies by product and jurisdiction.
—
Source: As reported by igamingbusiness.com.
