A federal judge has ruled that Utah can enforce its anti-gambling laws against prediction market platforms including Kalshi and Polymarket, handing the state a key win in a growing legal fight over whether these products should be treated as gambling or as federally regulated financial markets.
U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby rejected Kalshi’s request to block Utah’s restrictions. Kalshi sued the state in February, arguing that prediction markets fall exclusively under federal jurisdiction and should not be subject to state gambling laws. According to the source report, Utah residents can still place bets on the platforms for now.
Utah ruling adds to split over prediction markets
The decision is another notable ruling in a widening state-by-state court battle around Kalshi’s business model. Courts in Maryland, Nevada, Ohio, New York and Wisconsin have ruled against Kalshi in similar lawsuits, while judges in New Jersey, Tennessee, Arizona and Minnesota have sided with the company.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has defended prediction markets in court, underscoring the broader conflict between federal oversight arguments and state gambling enforcement.
Utah has taken a firm stance. Attorney General Derek Brown said, “Gambling is gambling, no matter what any company calls it.” Gov. Spencer Cox praised the ruling, saying such products are “causing tremendous harm to countless American families.”
What Kalshi users should watch next
Kalshi said it disagrees with the decision and plans to appeal. The source report also said Utah officials are still exploring enforcement options, even though the platforms remain accessible to Utah residents for now.
For prediction market users, the immediate takeaway is that access and legality may continue to vary by state as litigation moves forward. This Utah ruling does not settle the broader national dispute, but it does strengthen the position of states seeking to regulate prediction markets as gambling rather than finance.
—
Source: As reported by Hannah Schoenbaum.